Sitemap

Pages

• ATTORNEYS
  • Alexander Thomas
  • Amy N. Seilliere
  • Dana A. Suntag
  • Hon. Lesley D. Holland, Ret.
  • Jeanne M. Zolezzi
  • John Luebberke
  • Joshua J. Stevens
  • Lilliana K. Selke
  • Steven A. Herum
  • Steven D. Crabtree
• Contact Us
• Disclaimer
• FIRM PROFILE
• Home
• NEWS
• PRACTICE AREAS
• PUBLICATIONS
• Recruiting
• REPRESENTATIVE CASES
• Sitemap
• Websites by Our Designer: Monster Design Studios

Categories

• News (RSS) (114)
• Publications (RSS) (5)
• Representative Cases (RSS) (25)

Posts

• “A View of California’s Central Valley” presented at The Twenty-First Annual Land Use Law and Planning Conference UCLA Extension (0)
• “Successfully Navigating Competitive Bidding Procedures” presented at the Assoc. of Pacific Ports Winter Conf. (Jan 17, 2013) (0)
• American Canyon Community United for Responsible Growth v. City of American Canyon (2006), 145 Cal.App.4th 1062 (California Court of Appeal, First District) (0)
• Anderson First Coalition v. City of Anderson (2005), 130 Cal.App.4th 1173 (California Court of Appeal, Third District) (0)
• Appeals Court Hears Am Can Wal-Mart Case (0)
• Association of Irritated Residents v. County of Madera (2003), 107 Cal.App.4th 1383 (California Court of Appeal, Fifth District) (0)
• Athena Award 2004 (0)
• Attorney appointed to editorial board (0)
• Bad Roofs Draw Lawsuit: Stockton Homeowner’s Complaint Leads to Class Action (0)
• Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of Bakersfield (2004), 124 Cal.App.4th 1184 (California Court of Appeal, Fifth District) (0)
• Bigger Isn’t Always Better (0)
• Boxer Fears Program Overhaul-Democrat Also Backs Port-Access Funding (0)
• Boxer Sails Into Port (0)
• Bright Development v. City of Tracy (1993), 20 Cal.App.4th 783 (California Court of Appeal, Third District) (0)
• Business Briefs (0)
• California Drought Threatens Even Oldest Water Rights (0)
• California Farmers May Defy Notice to Stop Irrigating (0)
• California News (0)
• California Struggles to Manage Water Rights in Drought (0)
• California Trout v. Schaefer (1995), 58 F.3d 469 (United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit) (0)
• California water providers clash with feds over breached contracts (0)
• Central Delta Water Agency v. State Water Resources Control Bd. (2004), 124 Cal.App.4th 245 (California Court of Appeal, Third District) (0)
• Central Valley Water Agency v. U.S. (2004), 327 F.Supp.2d 1180 (United States District Court, E.D. California) (0)
• Ceres Officials Protest Southern Boundary for Modesto’s Measure I (0)
• Chamber opposed to prison facility in Stockton (0)
• City Won’t Appeal Wal-Mart Ruling (0)
• Clovis County Delays Ruling on Walmart Project (0)
• Compensation Likely for Local Water Districts (0)
• Council OKs Time for Greenbelt Plan (0)
• County of San Joaquin v. State Water Resources Control Board (1997), 54 Cal.App.4th 1144 (California Court of Appeal, Third District) (0)
• Court Brief: Stockton’s Rights Defied (0)
• Court Orders Government to Pay for Water Losses (0)
• Court Water Victory for San Joaquin (0)
• Decades-old Water Rights in California Halted Amid Drought (0)
• Delivery Drivers Sue Over Work Status at Company (0)
• Delta Wetlands Project Sets Stage for Suit (0)
• Delta Wetlands Properties v. County of San Joaquin (2004), 121 Cal.App.4th 128 (California Court of Appeal, Third District) (0)
• Deltakeeper v. Oakdale Irrigation Dist. (2201), 94 Cal.App.4th 1092 (California Court of Appeal, Third District) (0)
• Derivi Const. & Architecture, Inc. v. Wong (2004), 118 Cal.App.4th 1268 (California Court of Appeal, Third District) (0)
• District 5 Rep Revs Up (0)
• District appeals water lawsuit (0)
• El Dorado Irr. Dist. v. State Water Resources Control Bd. (2006), 142 Cal.App.4th 937 (California Court of Appeal, Third District) (0)
• Farmers Prevail in Court (0)
• Feds Must Pay $2.4M to California Water Users (0)
• Feds Shorted Water Districts, Judge Decides in California Case (0)
• Fees Squeeze (0)
• Gale Norton Addresses State’s Water Issues (0)
• Getting Ahead – Jennifer Scott (0)
• Getting Ahead – Karna E. Harrigfeld (0)
• Group Trying to Join Suit Over Stockton Growth Plan (0)
• Growth Foes Fight Water Sale (0)
• Growth Foes Fight Water Sale (0)
• Herum Crabtree to Merge with Suntag Law Firm (0)
• Idea of Prison Leads to Lawsuit (0)
• Ione, Developer Make Peace (0)
• It’s Lodi’s Move in Tussle on Wal-Mart (0)
• Judge Hears Arguments Against Supercenter Approval (0)
• Judge OKs Adalat Settlement (0)
• L.I.F.E. Committee v City of Lodi (1989), 213 Cal.App.3d 1139 (California Court of Appeal, Third District) (0)
• Lawsuit Pays Off (0)
• Lawsuits Over California Water Rights Are A Fight a Century In the Making (0)
• Lawyer Reassigned to Water Group (0)
• Leader of Lawyer’s Group Chosen (0)
• Local Agency Can Rely on Federal Permit Clearance as Valid CEQA Mitigation (Citizens Opposing a Dangerous Environment v. County of Kern (2014) 228 Cal.App.4th 360) (0)
• Local Attorney Makes Waves With Wal-Mart Greenbelt (0)
• Lodi Council Keeps Wal-mart Project Alive (0)
• Lodi council to consider Wal-mart supercenter (0)
• Lodi Gas Storage Plan Drives Wedge Between Neighbors (0)
• Lodi’s Analysis Deemed Defective (0)
• Making Nice (0)
• Memorial Hospitals Ass’n. v. Randol (1995), 38 Cal.App.4th 1300 (California Court of Appeal, Fifth District) (0)
• Mineral County v. State, Dept. of Conservation and Natural Resources (2001), 117 Nev. 235 (Supreme Court of Nevada) (0)
• More Angst As water Cuts Approach (0)
• New Turbulence in Water Dispute (0)
• North San Joaquin Water Conservation District (0)
• Officials Work to Keep Mokelumne River Water Rights (0)
• On the move: Herum again named ‘Super Lawyer’ (0)
• Once Again, Stockton gets the Shaft with Prison Hospital (0)
• Order Approves $40 Million in Attorney’s Fees (0)
• Peace Pact Signed (0)
• Plan to Bring USS Iowa to Stockton is Sinking (0)
• Port of Stockton Names New Legal Counsel (0)
• Price-Fix Lawsuit Settled: Lodi Beverage Maker Among Firms Benefiting (0)
• Prison Deal Awaits Approval (0)
• Prison Receiver Moves to Have Medical Suit Heard in Federal Court (0)
• Progress Slow on Settling Prison Medical Facility Issues (0)
• Project’s Demise Would Raise Energy Costs, Lawyers Argue (0)
• Retail Giant Backs Off (0)
• Ripon Wins Legal Battle Over Price of Property (0)
• Ripons Water Gets Two Boosts (0)
• Road to Harney Lane Hits Bump (0)
• Role Of Sematech Challenged: California Company Accuses Nonprofit Austin Consortium of Monopolizing Wafer Market (0)
• Rough & Ready for Workers: Port Takes Over Remaining 60 Acres from Navy (0)
• S.J. Supes OK Solar Facility (0)
• S.J.’s Marine Highway is Launched (0)
• San Joaquin County General Plan Update Process (0)
• San Joaquin County Supervisors Approve Solar Farm in Lockeford Area (0)
• San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Ctr. v. Co. of Merced (2007), 149 Cal.App.4th 645 (California Court of Appeal, Fifth District) (0)
• Santa Clara Law Review (0)
• Save Stanislaus Area Farm Economy v. Board of Supervisors (1993), 13 Cal.App.4th 141 (California Court of Appeal, Fifth District) (0)
• Settlement In Stockton – Spawned Lawsuit (0)
• Settlement Worth $107M (0)
• Sexual Harassment Overview for Employers (0)
• Sierra Club v. San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission (1999), 21 Cal.App.4th 489 (Supreme Court of California) (0)
• Sierra Club v. West Side Irr. Dist. (2005), 128 Cal.App.4th 690 (California Court of Appeal, Third District) (0)
• Site for Prison Hospital is Ok’d (0)
• SJ Water Users, Cut Off During Drought, Win a Round in Court (0)
• Some Water Agencies in California Consider Defying State Cuts (0)
• Someone Spinning A Fish Tale? (0)
• South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians, et al (2004), 541 U.S. 95 (United States Supreme Court) (0)
• Spanos Plan Raises Questions (0)
• Stanislaus Audubon Society, Inc. v. County of Stanislaus (1995), 33 Cal.App.4th 144 (California Court of Appeal, Fifth District) (0)
• Stanislaus Will Take a Harder Look at Well Permit Applications (0)
• State Board, Irrigation Districts Face Off In Sacramento (0)
• State Official Gets Earful on Planned Prison (0)
• State Officials Tell Junior Water Rights to Cease Diverting (0)
• State Water Resources Control Bd. Cases (2006), 136 Cal.App.4th 674 (California Court of Appeal, Third District) (0)
• Stockton Attorney Honored by Statewide Group (0)
• Stockton Lawyer Herum Joins Port Commission (0)
• Stocktonian’s Case Now A Class Action: Wood Sealer Allegedly Promotes Mildew Growth (0)
• Student Loan Dischargeability in Bankruptcy (0)
• Superior Court Judge Faults State’s Process of Curtailing Water Rights (0)
• Surprise Windfall for Health Care Providers: Leftover Lawsuit Funds go to Three Non-profits (0)
• The Battle Between Sovereign Immunity and State Law Natural Resources & Environment (0)
• The Twenty-First Annual Land Use Law and Planning ConferenceUpdates Trends and Assessments (0)
• Thinking Outside the Box: Will Wal-Mart’s Troubles Bring Am Can Budget to a Halt? (0)
• U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Liable for Breach of New Melones Water Contracts Court Says (0)
• Wal-mart Heading to Planning Commission After Months of Delay (0)
• Wal-Mart Plans Argued in Hearing (0)
• Wal-Mart Project Hits Legal Roadblock (0)
• Wal-mart Supercenter Debate (0)
• Wal-Mart Work Still on Hold, Judge Says: Latest Skirmish Over Am Can Supercenter Favors Big Fox Foes (0)
• Walmart Ready to Try Lodi Again (0)
• Walnut Orchard May Face Steamroller: Water District Seeks New Road Through (0)
• Water Cuts Affect More California Farmers (0)
• Water Suit Can Go Forward (0)
• Water, Public Law Expert Joins Stockton Firm (0)
• Westlands Water Dist. v. U.S. Dept. of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (1994), 850 F.Supp. 1388 (United States District Court, E.D. California) (0)
• Weyerhaeuser To Pay Out $105M For Faulty Roof Tiles (0)
• With Prison Hospital, Stockton Learns How to Bargain (0)
• With State, Get it in Writing (0)
• Women Sue San Joaquin Medical Society: Couple Accused of Sexual Harassment (0)
• You Messed with the Wrong Water Districts (0)
• Zoning designation could end ‘greenbelt wars’ (0)

Portfolios